Melisa S. Dargan, Administrator of the Estate of Kawanza Jamal Beaty v. The City of Newport News, Virginia et al
| Melisa S. Dargan, Administrator of the Estate of Kawanza Jamal Beaty |
| The City of Newport News, Virginia, Chief Richard W. Myers and Officer Randy Gibson |
| 4:2015cv00115 |
| October 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| Newport News City |
| Arenda L. Wright Allen |
| Robert J. Krask |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
Final Order - Before the Court is Plaintiffs Second Motion for Settlement, ECF No. 46 , and Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Settlement, ECF No. 50 , which were filed in accordance with Virginia's Wrongful Death Statute, Virginia Code § 8.01 -55. This Court has reviewed the R&R of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 70 ) and ADOPTS and APPROVES in full the findings and recommendations set forth therein. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Settlement (ECF No. [ 50]) is GRANTED, and the settlement proceeds shall be disbursed as stated herein. Plaintiffs Second Motion for Settlement (ECF No. 46 ) is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Clerk is REQUESTED to send a copy of this Final Order to all counsel of record. Copies distributed as directed. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 4/7/2017. (cchr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
