Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Hopeman Brothers, Inc. |
Continental Casualty Company and Lexington Insurance Company |
4:2016cv00187 |
December 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Newport News Office |
Augusta |
Mark S. Davis |
Lawrence R. Leonard |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 47 Motion to Bifurcate; denying 49 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 10/2/17. (bpet, ) |
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER: re 12 Motion MOTION to Enjoin the Second-Filed Action; 14 Motion to Transfer Case; 17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue to the Southern District of New York is DENIED, ECF No. 14, and Hopeman's Motion to Enjoin Continental and Lexington from prosecuting the second-filed action in the Southern District of New York, is GRANTED, but Hopeman's Motion to Enjoin the Second-Filed Action with respect to the New York co-plaintiffs is DENIED, ECF No. 12. Having decided the Motion to Transfer and Motion to Enjoin, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, and DIRECTS Defendants to file a responsive pleading or motion within fourteen days. ECF No. 17. Copy of Opinion and Order provided to counsel for Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 4/17/2017. (bgra) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.