Jackson v. Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center
| Ramona Jackson |
| Virginia Department of Corrections/Greenville Correctional Center and Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center |
| 4:2018cv00096 |
| August 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| Hampton City |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Robert J Krask |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Submission by Ramona Jackson. (epri) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to the Court's August 14, 2018 Order to Show Cause within forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 8.29.18. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 8/28/2018. (epri)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 by Ramona Jackson. (epri) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center, filed by Ramona Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment Part 1, #6 Attachment Part 2, #7 Attachment Part 3)(epri) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed by filing an Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order. Case caption corrected and copy of Order sent to plaintiff as DIRECTED on 8.14.18. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 8/13/2018. (epri)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ramona Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Attachment 2, #4 Attachment 3, #5 Attachment 4, #6 Attachment Part 1, #7 Attachment Part 2, #8 Attachment Part 3)(epri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ramona Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Virginia Department of Corrections/Greenville Correctional Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Virginia Department of Corrections/Greensville Correctional Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
