Baskerville v. Verizon Wireless
Plaintiff: Bennie Baskerville, Jr.
Defendant: Verizon Wireless Services, LLC and Verizon Wireless
Case Number: 4:2018cv00141
Filed: November 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Raymond A Jackson
Referring Judge: Robert J Krask
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2018 Filing 7 [SUBJECT TO DEFECT - UNTIMELY] RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement with Roseboro,. filed by Bennie Baskerville, Jr. (epri, )
November 19, 2018 Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement with Roseboro,. filed by Verizon Wireless. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Crain, Jerome)
November 19, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement with Roseboro,. by Verizon Wireless. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Crain, Jerome)
November 13, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service re #2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Jerome David Crain, Jr on behalf of Verizon Wireless (Crain, Jerome)
November 13, 2018 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, )
November 13, 2018 Notice of Correction re #2 Financial Disclosure Statement. Document number 2 does not contain a correct nine-element signature block. Please see Signatures: Nine Element Signature block in the E-Filing Policies and Procedures manual. Please refile the Certificate of Service with the nine-element signature block and link it to the Financial Disclosure Statement and include the nine-element signature block on future filings. (epri, )
November 12, 2018 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, )
November 12, 2018 Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Crain, Jerome)
November 12, 2018 Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6359550.), filed by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Crain, Jerome)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baskerville v. Verizon Wireless
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bennie Baskerville, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
Represented By: Jerome David Crain, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Wireless
Represented By: Jerome David Crain, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?