Gilstrap v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
| Jerry S. Gilstrap, Aaron Todd Gilstrap, James Scott Gilstrap, Erik Gilstrap, Dawn Gilstrap and Christopher Gilstrap |
| Huntington Ingalls Incorporated and John Does 1-450 (Inclusive) |
| 4:2019cv00068 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Response to Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporateds Motion to Dismiss filed by Erik Gilstrap. (George, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Erik Gilstrap re #12 Amended Complaint, Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice of Counts I through III (George, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(McGraw, Wendy) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (McGraw, Wendy) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Erik Gilstrap, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry S. Gilstrap, Deceased; Christopher Gilstrap; James Scott Gilstrap; Dawn Gilstrap; Aaron Todd Gilstrap.(George, Jonathan) Modified text on 7/29/2019 (clou). |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated's Motion to Dismiss filed by Jerry S. Gilstrap. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email from Plaintiff's Counsel to Defense Counsel)(George, Jonathan) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 , the Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Gibbs Henderson as certified by local counsel Jonathan George for Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 7/17/2019. (Allen, Arenda)
|
| Filing 9 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Gibbs Henderson and Certification of Local Counsel Jonathan George Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6741565. Application to Qualify as a Foreign Attorney by Jerry S. Gilstrap. (George, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor Marie Steffan on behalf of Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (Steffan, Taylor) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(McGraw, Wendy) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (McGraw, Wendy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Merideth Bryant Snow Daly on behalf of Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (Daly, Merideth) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (afar) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Wendy Cohen McGraw on behalf of Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (McGraw, Wendy) |
| Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (Cunningham, Alexandra) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated re #1 Notice of Removal (Cunningham, Alexandra) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6717661.), filed by Huntington Ingalls Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cunningham, Alexandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
