Tango Marine S.A. v. Elephant Group Limited et al
Tango Marine S.A. |
Elephant Group PLC and Elephant Group Limited |
Shine Bridge Global Incorporated |
4:2019cv00119 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Douglas E Miller |
Henry C Morgan |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tango Marine S.A. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 13 OPINION & ORDER: The Court FINDS that the current state of the record remains insufficient to grant a rule B attachment. Therefore, the Court DENIES the motion for attachment, with LEAVE TO RE-FILE no later than ten (10) days from the date this Opinion and Order is entered, provided that Plaintiff AMEND its verified complaint and file a new motion - which does not raise additional facts not contained in the verified complaint - no later than ten (10) days from the date this Court's Opinion and Order is entered. Further, the Court HOLDS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT FOR SERVICE, doc. 8, IN ABEYANCE. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 1/6/20. (afar) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION for Issuance of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment filed by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Pro hac vice for John Stephen Simms as to Tango Marine S.A. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 12/02/2019. (bboy, ) |
Filing 10 Amended Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by John Stephen Simms and Certification of Local Counsel David N. Ventker by Tango Marine S.A. (Ventker, David) Modified text on 11/27/19 (bpet, ) |
Notice of Correction re #9 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice: Document number 9: Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice does not contain the signature of the applicant. Local counsel should file a corrected motion that includes the written signature of the applicant. Counsel should not pay a second fee. (bboy, ) |
Filing 9 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by John Stephen Simms and Certification of Local Counsel David N. Ventker Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6955838. by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (afar) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment for Service of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment by Tango Marine S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Appointment for Service of Writs of Maritime Garnishment)(Ventker, David) |
Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION for Issuance of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment filed by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Issuance of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment by Tango Marine S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Directing Clerk to Issue Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment, #2 Exhibit Proposed Writ for Maritime Attachment and Garnishment)(Ventker, David) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons to Elephant Group PLC by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Elephant Group Limited by Tango Marine S.A.. (Ventker, David) |
Filing 1 Complaint Verified Complaint and Request for Issuance of Writs of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6953955.), filed by Tango Marine S.A..(Ventker, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.