Tolliver v. Freemasons of Virginia et al
| Anthony Rashad Tolliver |
| Harpoon Larry's, Freemasons of Virginia, Mark Greene, Central Intelligence Agency, Riverside Hospital and Ronald Smith |
| 4:2020cv00132 |
| August 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert J Krask |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Rashad Tolliver. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(epri, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2020: #2 Proposed Amended Complaint) (epri, ). |
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is DENIED. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to either (i) remit the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee, or (ii) complete an "Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form)" ("Long Form IFP Application"), and submit it to the court for consideration within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order. A copy of this Order, along with a copy of the court's Long Form IFP Application, sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 8.21.20. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 8/21/2020. (epri, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Rashad Tolliver. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
