Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Joetta Grant
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 4:2020cv00133
Filed: August 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Mark S Davis
Referring Judge: Douglas E Miller
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joetta Grant. SSA (Social Security Administration) served on 8/28/2020 (afar)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew M. Saul via U.S. Attorney General served on 9/8/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (mrees, )
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew M. Saul via U.S. Attorney served on 9/10/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (mrees, )
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Joetta Grant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(epri, )
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Three (3) Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service Packages delivered to USM with certified copies of Order and USM 285 Forms. (Attachments: #1 Judge's Instructions, #2 USM 285 Forms)(mrees, )
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue summons, and the United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon the defendant(s), as directed by the plaintiff. All cost of service shall be advanced by the United States.. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 8/25/20. (mrees, )
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION In Forma Pauperis re #1 Complaint by Joetta Grant. (Gillikin, Robert)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons all 3 summonses with Form 285s by Joetta Grant. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Form 285s)(Gillikin, Robert)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Joetta Grant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gillikin, Robert)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Initial Case Assignment to Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joetta Grant
Represented By: Robert Wayne Gillikin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?