West v. Roses Discount Store et al
| Gayle R. West |
| Variety Stores, Inc. doing business as Roses Discount Stores VA Entity ID F0030884 and Roses Discount Store |
| 4:2020cv00170 |
| November 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Protective Order entered as modified at paragraphs 1 and 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 3/9/2021. (tamarm, )
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Miller. #13 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order (tamarm, ) |
| Filing 14 Brief in Support to #13 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc.. (Gonzalez, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Protective Order by Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gonzalez, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Warren Gonzalez on behalf of Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc. (Gonzalez, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 11
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 6/28/2021 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk. Jury Trial is set for 7/13/2021 at 11:00 AM in Norfolk. A Settlement Conference is set for 4/13/2021 at 09:30 AM by using the remote access program Zoom. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on January 7, 2021. (sche)
|
|
Filing 10
Settlement Conference Order. All parties and their lead counsel are required to appear via Zoomgov remote proceedings for a settlement conference at 9:30 a.m. on 4/13/2021. The parties must submit a brief memorandum by noon on 4/9/2021. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 1/7/2021. (tamarm, )
|
| Scheduling Conference - Rule 16b held on 1/7/2021. (sche) |
|
Filing 9
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for 1/7/2021 at 10:00 AM by conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on December 1, 2020. (sche)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John Albert Singleton on behalf of Gayle R. West (Singleton, John) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Alexis Dunn on behalf of Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc. (Dunn, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Alexis Dunn on behalf of Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc. (Dunn, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 Letter to plaintiff's attorney re: associating with local counsel. (epri, ) |
| Filing 4 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc.. (epri, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Variety Stores, Inc. dba/aka Roses Discount Store VA Entity ID F0030884. (Wright, Gibson) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7484930.), filed by Roses Discount Store, Variety Stores, Inc. dba/aka Roses Discount Store VA Entity ID F0030884. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Wright, Gibson) |
| Referred for 16(b). (epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
