Hilliard v. Hess
Plaintiff: Anthony Carlton Hilliard
Defendant: Ellen Marie Hess
Case Number: 4:2021cv00098
Filed: August 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Douglas E Miller
Referring Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Ellen Marie Hess. (Adams, Rachel)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Ellen Marie Hess. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Adams, Rachel)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Willer Adams on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Adams, Rachel)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William Daniel Prince, IV on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Prince, William)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William Woodul Tunner on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Tunner, William)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Ellen Marie Hes served on 9/3/2021. (epri, )
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ellen Marie Hess. Service package delivered to U.S. Marshal with certified copy of IFP Order and USM 285 form. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures, #2 USM 285 form)(epri, )
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Ellen Marie Hess, filed by Anthony Carlton Hilliard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(epri, )
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue a summons in this action and prepare a service packet containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, and this Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to deliver the service packet to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order on the Commissioner of the Virginia Employment Commission. A copy of Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 8.31.21. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young and filed on 8/31/2021. (epri, )
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Carlton Hilliard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hilliard v. Hess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Carlton Hilliard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ellen Marie Hess
Represented By: William Woodul Tunner
Represented By: Rachel Willer Adams
Represented By: William Daniel Prince, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?