Jones v. Credit Control Corporation
Malik Jones |
Credit Control Corporation |
4:2021cv00147 |
November 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Douglas E Miller |
Roderick C Young |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 4/5/2022 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (cdod, ) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike by Credit Control Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Opposition, #2 Proposed Order)(Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 9 Opposition to #6 MOTION to Strike filed by Credit Control Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Canter, Bradley) |
Notice of Correction re #9 Opposition. When you filed document number 9 you needed leave of court to file the document as the opposition response is untimely. The proposed document should have been filed as an attachment to a motion for leave. Please file a motion for leave with a proposed order and the proposed document as an attachment to the motion. (epri, ) |
![]() |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Roderick C. Young: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 1/12/2022. Plaintiff appeared Pro Se. Defendant appeared through Bradley Canter. The matter was set for a final pretrial conference and a 2 day jury trial. The Court is to issue a Scheduling Order. Court's offer to appoint attorney to represent plaintiff for limited purposes of a settlement conference was declined. Defendant's attorney advised that there was a pending related case filed at 4:21cv156. Court in recess. (Court Reporter Jill Trail, OCR.) (jjon) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION to Strike Credit Control Corporation's Affirmative Defenses by Malik Jones. (epri, ) |
Referred for 16(b). (epri, ) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credit Control Corporation. (Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Credit Control Corporation.(Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Credit Control Corporation, served on 12/9/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Credit Control Corporation. Service package mailed to pro se plaintiff on 12.1.2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credit Control Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 44683011788.), filed by Malik Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Credit Control Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Malik Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credit Control Corporation | |
Represented By: | Bradley Todd Canter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.