Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae [FNMA] v. George et al
Plaintiff: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae [FNMA]
Defendant: Cyril R.S. George and Roxanne George
Case Number: 4:2022cv00080
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
2 Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 10/26/22. (epri, )
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINAL ORDER: Defendants' Notice of Removal is deemed ineffective, Defendants' request for removal is DENIED, and this action is hereby CLOSED. This Order was docketed in the Court's electronic filing system and a copy was sent to Defendants as DIRECTED on 10.26.22. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and filed on 10/26/22. (epri, )
October 6, 2022 Case Reassigned to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes. District Judge Roderick C. Young no longer assigned to the case. (afar)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Defendants are ORDERED to file an Amended Notice of Removal within fourteen days of the date of entry of this Order. Defendants are ADVISED that the Amended Notice of Removal must (i) clearly identify the state court action that Defendants seek to remove; and (ii) fully comply with the removal requirements set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1446. If Defendants fail to comply with the terms of this Order, Defendants' Notice of Removal will be deemed ineffective, the request for removal will be denied, and the action in this Court will be closed. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 9.28.22 Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young and filed on 9/28/22. (epri, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 3 Letter to attorney re: associating with local counsel. Letter mailed to attorney on 7.25.22.(epri, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Newport News General District Court, case number GV22004628-00 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 44683012274.), filed by Cyril R.S. George, Roxanne George. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) #5 Receipt) (epri, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae [FNMA] v. George et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae [FNMA]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cyril R.S. George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roxanne George
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?