Vogts v Genie Jar Marketing, LLC
| Brandon Vogts |
| Genie Jar Marketing, LLC |
| 4:2022cv00124 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Genie Jar Marketing, LLC. (Burch, Kristan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Genie Jar Marketing, LLC.(Burch, Kristan) |
| Refer for 16(b) (afar) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brandon Vogts All Defendants (Schleifman, Paul) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Dustin H. Hevore, Registered Agent on 12/8/2022, filed by Brandon Vogts. (Schleifman, Paul) |
| Notice of Correction re #5 Affidavit of Service: The incorrect event was used and the Original Summons was not returned. As noted in docket entry at ECF #3 the correct event that should have been used was "Summons Returned Executed." No further action is required at this time. (afar) |
| Filing 4 Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding a copyright. (dbra, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Genie Jar Marketing, LLC, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by Brandon Vogts. (Schleifman, Paul) |
| Notice of Correction re [1-4], Summons and [1-5], Report on filing. The Summons should not have been attached to the initiating document and has been removed. Please refile the Summons using the Proposed Summons event. The Report has been removed and refiled by the clerk's office.(epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8685732.) , filed by Brandon Vogts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, # 4 Summons, # 5 Rpt on filing, #6 Cert of Interested Persons)(Schleifman, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vogts v Genie Jar Marketing, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brandon Vogts | |
| Represented By: | Paul Steven Schleifman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Genie Jar Marketing, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Kristan Boyd Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
