Banks v. The United States, et al
| Michael-Shawn Banks |
| The United States, et al and The State of Virginia |
| 4:2023cv00004 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark S Davis |
| Robert J Krask |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Waiver of re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. Oral Argument by The State of Virginia (Brown, Calvin) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by The State of Virginia. (Brown, Calvin) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by The State of Virginia. (Brown, Calvin) |
| Filing 2 Three (3) Summonses Issued as to The State of Virginia and the United States. Service packets mailed to pro se plaintiff on 2.6.23. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The State of Virginia, The United States, et al ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 200000405.), filed by Michael-Shawn Banks. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
