BAC InfraTrust Sechs GmbH & Co. KG v. Whitaker Racing, Inc. et al

Defendant: Whitaker Racing, Inc. and Charles Edward Whitaker
Plaintiff: BAC InfraTrust Sechs GmbH & Co. KG
Case Number: 1:2012cv00085
Filed: November 30, 2012
Court: Virginia Western District Court
Office: Abingdon Office
Presiding Judge: James P. Jones
Referring Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAC InfraTrust Sechs GmbH & Co. KG v. Whitaker Racing, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Whitaker Racing, Inc.
Represented By: Kurt Joseph Pomrenke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Edward Whitaker
Represented By: Kurt Joseph Pomrenke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BAC InfraTrust Sechs GmbH & Co. KG
Represented By: Reginald Mark Jones
Represented By: Farah Ahmad Shah
Represented By: Nicholas Thomas Solosky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?