Harleysville Insurance Company v. Holding Funeral Home, Inc. et al
1:2015cv00057 |
November 23, 2015 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Abingdon Office |
James P. Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 Objections to the magistrate judge's Order 69 ; granting 70 Objections to the magistrate judge's Order 69 , and the magistrate judge's Order imposing monetary sanctions 100 is VACATED; Granting 106 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 10/2/17. (flc) |
Filing 99 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 07/28/2017. (Bordwine, Robin) |
Filing 96 OPINION AND ORDER that an evidentiary hearing be set and directing the Clerk to schedule such hearing at the parties earliest convenience. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 5/19/2017. (lml) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 02/09/2017. (Bordwine, Robin) |
Filing 43 OPINION AND ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 9/8/16. (sas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harleysville Insurance Company v. Holding Funeral Home, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.