Smith v. Ratliff
Jimmy Dale Smith |
Ashley Elizabeth Ratliff |
1:2019cv00016 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
James P Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ashley Elizabeth Ratliff (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400; Receipt #: 0423-3113158.), filed by Jimmy Dale Smith. (Attachments: #1 Virginia Uniform Summons)(#2 Civil Cover Sheet) (flc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Ratliff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dale Smith | |
Represented By: | Edmund Ruffin Michie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ashley Elizabeth Ratliff | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.