Mullins v. Town of Richlands, Virginia et al
Mark Mullins |
Randy Smith, Timothy Taylor, Town of Richlands, Virginia, Frank Dorton and Jerry Gilbert, Chief of Police of Richlands, Virginia |
1:2019cv00017 |
April 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
James P Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Proposed Summons by Mark Mullins as to Frank Dorton.(Agraharkar, Vishal) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons by Mark Mullins as to Jerry Gilbert, Chief of Police of Richlands, Virginia.(Agraharkar, Vishal) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons by Mark Mullins as to Randy Smith.(Agraharkar, Vishal) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Mark Mullins as to Timothy Taylor.(Agraharkar, Vishal) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Mark Mullins as to Town of Richlands, Virginia.(Agraharkar, Vishal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Richlands, Virginia, Timothy Taylor, Town Manager of Richlands,Virginia, Frank Dorton, Former Chief of Police of Richlands, Virginia, Jerry Gilbert, Chief of Police of Richlands, Virginia, Randy Smith, Chair, Planning Commission of Richlands, Virginia (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400.00, Receipt #0423-3113729), filed by Mark Mullins. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B) #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (lml). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.