Sugar v. Emory & Henry College
| Anne Meredith Sugar |
| Emory & Henry College |
| 1:2020cv00005 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Emory & Henry College (Houston, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Donald Houston on behalf of Emory & Henry College (Houston, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth Davis on behalf of Emory & Henry College (Davis, Mary)
|
|
Filing 3
Electronic Summons Issued as to Emory & Henry College NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(ejs)
|
|
Filing 2
Electronic Summons Issued as to Emory & Henry College NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(ejs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Emory & Henry College (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400.00; Receipt #0423-3340625 ), filed by Anne Meredith Sugar. (Attachments: #1 Ex A, #2 Ex B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ejs)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
