Locklear v. Smith et al
| Christopher Lee Locklear |
| A.J. Smith, Tammy Gillespie and Southwest Regional Jail Authority |
| 1:2022cv00044 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
OPINION and ORDER. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint setting forth additional facts supporting his claims within 21 days of this date. If he fails to do so, his case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 01/31/2023. (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(am)
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Tammy Gillespie, A.J. Smith, Southwest Regional Jail Authority, filed by Christopher Lee Locklear.(am)
|
|
Filing 2
MINUTE ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Entered by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 12/13/2022. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(am)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Lee Locklear. (am)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
