Riley v. Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc. et al
| Teresa Sue Riley |
| Debra K. Riggs, Timothy Riggs, Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc., Debra Tankersley, Debby Riggs and Tim Riggs |
| 1:2023cv00036 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Teresa Sue Riley. Debra K. Riggs waiver sent on 10/27/2023, answer due 12/26/2023.(Tahinci, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Teresa Sue Riley. Timothy Riggs waiver sent on 10/27/2023, answer due 12/26/2023.(Tahinci, Alexis) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Teresa Sue Riley. Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc. waiver sent on 10/27/2023, answer due 12/26/2023.(Tahinci, Alexis) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If needed, forms may also be found at #www.vawd.uscourts.gov/forms.aspx. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/11/2023. (flc)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc., Debra K. Riggs, Timothy Riggs, filed by Teresa Sue Riley.(aab) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Teresa Sue Riley. (aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
