Dugger v. Stiltner
| Mathew R Dugger |
| Eddie Stiltner |
| 1:2023cv00037 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
JUDGMENT in favor of the defendant; clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 11/6/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(flc)
|
|
Filing 11
OPINION and ORDER granting #7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint #9 is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 11/6/2023. (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(flc)
|
|
Filing 10
REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Eddie Stiltner. (Bernhardt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 9
PRO SE RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Mathew R Dugger. (flc)
|
|
Filing 8
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Eddie Stiltner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Emergency Protective Order)(Bernhardt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Eddie Stiltner. (Bernhardt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Praeger Bernhardt on behalf of Eddie Stiltner (Bernhardt, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mathew R Dugger. Eddie Stiltner served on 10/12/2023, answer due 11/2/2023.(flc)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Eddie Stiltner.(am)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If needed, forms may also be found at #www.vawd.uscourts.gov/forms.aspx. Entered by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 10/06/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(sln) Modified date filed on 10/6/2023 (sln).
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Eddie Stiltner, filed by Mathew R Dugger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sln)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mathew R Dugger. (sln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dugger v. Stiltner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mathew R Dugger | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eddie Stiltner | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Praeger Bernhardt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
