Duty v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Billy Duty |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 1:2023cv00054 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER:( Jury Trial set for 2/18-20/2025 09:30 AM in Abingdon before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs.), Order Referring Case to US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 2/1/2024. (mka)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing: (N) (No Interpreter requested) (#Click on this link for guidance for participation via Zoom and #Click on this link for instructions on how to listen to public hearings) Scheduling Conference set for 1/31/2024 01:00 PM in via Zoom before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski. (mka) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Karissa Hazzard Range on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Range, Karissa) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF F. TUCKER BURGE, JR. by Frank Tucker Burge, Jr on behalf of Billy Duty (Burge, Frank) |
| Filing 11 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (laa) |
| Filing 10 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Massie, Wade) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint, by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Massie, Wade) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance NOTICE OF APPEARANCE - F. TUCKER BURGE, SR. by Frank Tucker Burge, Sr on behalf of Billy Duty (Burge, Frank) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to F. Tucker Burge, Jr. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 12/20/2023. (flc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to F. Tucker Burge, Sr.. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 12/20/2023. (flc) Modified on 12/20/2023 to correct link in docket text (flc).
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for F. Tucker Burge, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AVAWDC-4323873. by Billy Duty. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jackson, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for F. Tucker Burge, Sr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AVAWDC-4323843. by Billy Duty. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Jackson, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(aab) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons for Norfolk Southern Railway Company by Billy Duty (Jackson, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Filing & Administrative fee $ 405 receipt number AVAWDC-4318824.), filed by Billy Duty. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmc) All documents replaced on 12/12/2023 with corrected PDF and NEF regenerated (kmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
