Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc. v. Booth et al
| Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc. |
| Brooke Booth and Wendy Hasenbalg |
| 1:2024cv00023 |
| May 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order on Motion to Disclose.. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 05/31/2024.(kmc) Modified on 5/31/2024 (kmc).Document viewing restricted due to docket entry filed in incorrect case
|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wendy Hasenbalg NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(kmc) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Brooke Booth NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(kmc) |
| Filing 2 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc. (kmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brooke Booth, Wendy Hasenbalg (Filing & Administrative fee $ 405 receipt number AVAWDC-4438597.), filed by Kindred Cain9 Connections, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
