Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Vadis Lambert
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2008cv00055
Filed: September 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Tazewell
Presiding Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Presiding Judge: Glen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; defendant's previous decision denying benefits is affirmed. Signed by Judge Glen M. Williams on 6/8/09. (ehs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vadis Lambert
Represented By: Vernon Mandel Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?