Keitz v. Unnamed Sponsors of Cocaine Research Study et al
| Michael James Keitz |
| Unnamed Director of UVA Center for Addiction Research, Unnamed Sponsors of Cocaine Research Study, Commonwealth Of Virginia, UVA Center for Addiction Research, University of Virginia and Medical Center, Unnamed #1 Male Nurse, UVA Care, Unnamed #2 Male Doctor, UVA Care, Unnamed #4, 5, 6 Male E.R. Doctors, UVA Medical Center and Unnamed #3 Female Research Assistant, UVA Care |
| 3:2011cv00054 |
| August 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Charlottesville Office |
| Glen E. Conrad |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/31/2013. (ssm)
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/01/2013. (ssm)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 07/19/2013. (ssm) Modified on 7/22/2013 to reflect correct signature date (ssm).
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER dismissing Amended Complaint, 17 filed by Michael James Keitz, Memorandum Opinion 19 . Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/16/2011. (mab)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/1/2011. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
