Cunningham v. Delhaize America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sylvia Cunningham
Defendant: Delhaize America, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00002
Filed: January 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Charlottesville Office
Presiding Judge: B. Waugh Crigler
Presiding Judge: Glen E. Conrad
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/27/2012. (mab)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. Delhaize America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvia Cunningham
Represented By: THE CHANDLER LAW GROUP PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Delhaize America, Inc.
Represented By: Warren Hunter Britt
Represented By: Anne Catherine Byrne
Represented By: Ankur Kanubhai Patel
Represented By: Jared Andrew Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?