Shenton v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc.
3:2018cv00038 |
June 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Charlottesville Office |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/7/2018. (hnw) |
Filing 22 ORDER that this matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on May 21, 2018. (ECF No. 21 .) The time to file objections has expired and no party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the mat ter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) The R&R, (ECF No. 21 ), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; (2) Defendant Aerojet Rocketdyne's Motion to Change Venue, (ECF No. 14 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and, (3) This action is TRANSFERRED to the Charlottesville Division of the Western District of Virginia. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/06/2018. (walk, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/6/2018.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shenton v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.