Gladden v. Oberholzer
| Jamar Antwaun Gladden |
| R. A. Oberholzer |
| 3:2019cv00009 |
| February 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Jackson L Kiser |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
PRETRIAL ORDER, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 4/5/19. (ham)
|
| Filing 16 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (ham) |
| Filing 15 Roseboro Notice re #12 MOTION to Dismiss to Jamar Antwaun Gladden. Deadline set for 4/22/2019. (ham) (Main Document 15 replaced on 4/5/2019) - corrected division (ham). |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint #2 by R. A. Oberholzer.(Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 13 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by R. A. Oberholzer. (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by R. A. Oberholzer. (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement . filed by Jamar Antwaun Gladden. (hnw) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to file an appropriate pleading, setting forth the details underlying his Complaint, within 14 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/12/2019. (mlh)
|
| Filing 9 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by R. A. Oberholzer (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 8 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement . filed by R. A. Oberholzer. (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for More Definite Statement by R. A. Oberholzer. (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Hustis Milnor on behalf of R. A. Oberholzer (Milnor, Richard) |
| Filing 5 Marshal's Return of service of Summons and Complaint on 2/15/19 upon R.A. Oberholzer(hnw) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to R. A. Oberholzer. (Attachment: #1 USM-285 to R. A. Oberholzer)(Original summons, original USM-285, copy of Doc. 1/Complaint and copy of Doc. 2/Order mailed to USMS for service upon defendant.)(mlh) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/12/2019. (mlh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against R. A. Oberholzer, filed by Jamar Antwaun Gladden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(hnw) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/ MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jamar Antwaun Gladden. (hnw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gladden v. Oberholzer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R. A. Oberholzer | |
| Represented By: | John Walter Zunka |
| Represented By: | Richard Hustis Milnor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamar Antwaun Gladden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
