Bhattacharya v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
| Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya |
| Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia |
| 3:2019cv00054 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #11 Motion for access to the Court's Case Management /Electronic Case Filing System. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/7/19. (hnw)
|
|
Filing 16
ORAL ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss and STAYING Discovery Deadlines and #4 Pretrial Order Deadlines pending the filing of Motion to Dismiss. If after the filing of the Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff determines he needs discovery he may make a request specifying the discovery he needs.. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/5/19. (hnw)
|
|
Filing 15
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/5/2019 re #5 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss filed by Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, #11 MOTION request for access to CM/ECF System filed by Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya. (FTR Operator: H. Wheeler) (hnw)
|
|
Filing 14
FTR Log Notes for Telephonic Motion Hearing in the Charlottesville Division in CR3 held before Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/5/19. In accordance with 28 USC 753(b), I certify that I monitored the digital recording of this proceeding and that it is a true and correct record, that it is sufficiently intelligible when played on the FTR (For the Record) Player, and that it can be transcribed without undue difficulty. FTR Operator: H. Wheeler (hnw)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Telephonic Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss : (FTR) Telephonic Motion Hearing set for 11/5/2019 03:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. Chambers to email dial in information to counsel. Clerk gave dial in info to Mr. Bhattacharya.(kld)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE in Support re #5 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss . filed by Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. (Gibson, Madeline)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION/ Request for access to CM/ECF System by Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (jcj)
|
|
Filing 10
PLAINTIFF KIERAN RAVI BHATTACHARYA'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES (FRCP 26(a)(1) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4)(jcj)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya re #7 Response in Opposition to Motion (jcj)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Jury Trial set for July 22-24, 2020 09:30 AM in Charlottesville before Senior Judge Norman K. Moon. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs. (hnw)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss. filed by Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(jcj)
|
|
Filing 6
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss . filed by Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. (Gibson, Madeline)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Stay Discovery Pending Filing And Resolution of Motion to Dismiss by Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gibson, Madeline)
|
|
Filing 4
PRETRIAL ORDER. CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe.. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 10/1/19. (jcj)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Madeline Markelz Gibson on behalf of Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (Gibson, Madeline)
|
|
Filing 2
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia waiver sent on 9/30/2019, answer due 12/2/2019.(jcj)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400; Receipt 0423-300003211.), filed by Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits 1-25, #3 Exhibits 26-56; Exhbits 9 and 46b are audio recordings on a thumb drive located in the Clerk's office)(jcj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bhattacharya v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kieran Ravi Bhattacharya | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia | |
| Represented By: | Madeline Markelz Gibson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
