Scott v. 1105 Inglecress, LLC et al
Plaintiff: W. Stephen Scott
Defendant: 1105 Inglecress, LLC and Richard L. Booth
In Re: Victor Maceo Dandridge, III
Case Number: 3:2019cv00072
Filed: November 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Glen E Conrad
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Filing 8 Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Compel , #7 Brief / Memorandum in Support, . filed by W. Stephen Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Sherrod, Andrew)
January 6, 2020 Filing 7 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Compel . filed by 1105 Inglecress, LLC, Richard L. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(Blank, Jonathan)
January 6, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Compel by 1105 Inglecress, LLC, Richard L. Booth. (Blank, Jonathan)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion to Withdraw Reference. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/26/19. (hnw)
November 26, 2019 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/26/19. (hnw)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3 REPLY to Response in opposition to Motion re #1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference filed by 1105 Inglecress, LLC, Richard L. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(hnw)
November 26, 2019 Filing 2 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference. filed by W. Stephen Scott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(hnw)
November 26, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference by 1105 Inglecress, LLC, Richard L. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memoraundum in Support, #3 Docket Sheet)(hnw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. 1105 Inglecress, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Victor Maceo Dandridge, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1105 Inglecress, LLC
Represented By: John Henry Maddock
Represented By: Jonathan Todd Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard L. Booth
Represented By: John Henry Maddock
Represented By: Jonathan Todd Blank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: W. Stephen Scott
Represented By: Robert Schaefer Westermann
Represented By: William Stephen Scott
Represented By: Andrew Philip Sherrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?