Loancare, LLC v. Paymap, Inc.
| Loancare, LLC |
| Paymap, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00063 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Norman K Moon |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order to Remand Case to Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to strike this case from the Court's active docket, and to TERMINATE all pending motions. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 10/29/2020. (dg)
|
| Filing 10 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Remand . filed by Loancare, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Allison Bielby Declaration))(Lacy, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Loancare, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lacy, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Eastern District of Virginia by Paymap, Inc.. (Frye, Eric) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/28/2020: #1 Proposed Order) (dg). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defendant shall SHOW CAUSE within five (5) days why the Court should not remand this case to the Circuit Court for the City of Virginia Beach. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 10/23/2020. (dg)
|
| Filing 6 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Paymap, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent EarnUp, Inc. for Paymap, Inc.. (Frye, Eric) |
| Filing 5 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Transfer Case . filed by Paymap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Frye, Eric) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case by Paymap, Inc.. (Frye, Eric) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Requirement to Loancare, LLC, and Paymap, Inc. - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (dg) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (dg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from City of Virginia Beach Circuit Court, case number CL20.5710. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt number AVAWDC-3521971), filed by Paymap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Loancare, LLC v. Paymap, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Loancare, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Edward Lacy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paymap, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric Thomas Frye |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
