Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Town of Culpeper
| Regal Cinemas, Inc. |
| Town of Culpeper |
| 3:2021cv00004 |
| February 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Glen E Conrad |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Town of Culpeper. (Callahan, Brett)
|
|
Filing 13
Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #8 Brief / Memorandum in Support . filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Ames, Lela)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss - Responses due by 4/5/2021. Signed by Senior Judge Glen E. Conrad on 3/15/2021. (ssm)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ames, Lela)
|
|
Filing 10
Scheduling Letter (ssm)
|
|
Filing 9
Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (dg)
|
|
Filing 8
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Town of Culpeper. (Callahan, Brett)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Town of Culpeper. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Callahan, Brett)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Anna Callahan on behalf of Town of Culpeper (Callahan, Brett)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Martin R. Crim on behalf of Town of Culpeper (Crim, Martin)
|
|
Filing 4
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Town of Culpeper on 2-16-2021, filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc..(Ames, Lela)
|
|
Filing 3
Electronic Summons Issued as to Town of Culpeper NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(dg)
|
|
Filing 2
Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Regal Cinemas, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Cinemaworld Group, plc for Regal Cinemas, Inc.. (dg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Town of Culpeper (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402. Receipt number AVAWDC-3628423.), filed by Regal Cinemas, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(dg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. Town of Culpeper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Town of Culpeper | |
| Represented By: | Brett Anna Callahan |
| Represented By: | Martin R. Crim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Regal Cinemas, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lela Marie Ames |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
