Wheaton v. Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge
| Donna Wheaton |
| Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge |
| 3:2022cv00050 |
| September 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
PRETRIAL ORDER, CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 11/03/2022. (dg)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint by Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge.(Huff, Catherine) |
| Paul G. Klockenbrink, in accordance with Section B.9. of the Administrative Procedures for Filing, Signing and Verifying Pleadings and Papers by Electronic Means, a registered user is responsible for ensuring their mailing address, primary email address, and telephone number are kept up-to-date with this court by #updating the information in their PACER account. To update your information, log into PACER.gov and click the Maintenance tab to Update this information with this court. (aab) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 09/28/2022. (dg)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Granger Klockenbrink on behalf of Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (Klockenbrink, Paul) |
| Filing 5 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (Huff, Catherine) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Catherine) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Donna Wheaton. Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge served on 9/7/2022, answer due 9/28/2022.(Coffield, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(dg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt number AVAWDC-4024842.), filed by Donna Wheaton. (Attachments: #1 Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wheaton v. Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donna Wheaton | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Lawrence Coffield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westminster-Canterbury of the Blue Ridge | |
| Represented By: | Catherine Jackson Huff |
| Represented By: | Paul Granger Klockenbrink |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
