Saphilom v. Hart et al
| Keolattana Tootoo Saphilom |
| Benjamin John Hart and Wanda Hart |
| 3:2023cv00026 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Norman K Moon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Roseboro Notice re #7 MOTION for More Definite Statement (Notice mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail).(skm) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Benjamin John Hart, Wanda Hart. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Power of Attorney, #2 Exhibit 2 - Power of Attorney)(Isenhour, Floyd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Floyd Elbert Isenhour, III on behalf of All Defendants (Isenhour, Floyd) |
| Filing Fee Received $ 402, receipt number 300003905. (jv) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee by Keolattana Tootoo Saphilom. (Attachments: #1 Copies of IFP denial Orders)(slt) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 6/7/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Benjamin John Hart and Wanda Hart, filed by Keolattana Tootoo Saphilom. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(skm) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keolattana Tootoo Saphilom. (skm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
