Ritchie v. Gunden
| Julie Ritchie |
| Roger Gunden |
| 3:2024cv00006 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Norman K Moon |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Reply re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Roger Gunden. (Tate, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Hearing: (N) Scheduling Conference set for 4/30/2024 09:00 AM by telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (kld)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Julie Ritchie. (Wilkins, Moriah)
|
|
9 Oral Order granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Ge'Andra D. Johnson. (skm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORAL ORDER granting #8 MOTION for Ge'Andra D. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 3/25/24. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to any applicable pro se party/parties via US Mail)(JCH)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for GEANDRA JOHNSON to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AVAWDC-4392392. by Julie Ritchie. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (Wilkins, Moriah)
|
|
Filing 7
PRETRIAL ORDER and Order referring all nondispositive pretrial motions and issues, including any requested changes in this order, to United States Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 3/18/2024. (dsa)
|
|
Filing 6
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Roger Gunden. (Tate, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Roger Gunden. (Tate, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Roger Gunden on 2/23/2024, filed by Julie Ritchie.(Wilkins, Moriah)
|
|
Filing 3
Electronic Summons Issued as to Roger Gunden NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(skm)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons for Roger Gunden by Julie Ritchie (Wilkins, Moriah)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Roger Gunden (Filing & Administrative fee $ 405 receipt number AVAWDC-4359548), filed by Julie Ritchie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (dsa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ritchie v. Gunden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julie Ritchie | |
| Represented By: | Moriah Jasmine Wilkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Roger Gunden | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Ryan Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
