Benson et al v. Social Security Administration
| Sam Edward Benson and Charlene Ann Benson |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv00019 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Social Security Administration served on 4/21/2021, answer due 6/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Return as to Attorney General, #2 Return as to Social Security Administration)(ham)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 USM 285's)(mka)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If needed, forms may also be found at #www.vawd.uscourts.gov/forms.aspx. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/6/2021. (Order, 3 Summons forms and 3 USM-285 forms were mailed to Pro Se Plaintiffs via US Mail)(ham)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration filed by Charlene Ann Benson and Sam Edward Benson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(ham)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charlene Ann Benson and Sam Edward Benson. (ham)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
