Raposo v. Clark
| Michael Raposo |
| Fred Clark |
| 4:2022cv00112 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER. Dispositive Motions due by 6/26/2023. CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 10/31/2022. (Order emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) Jury Trial set for 9/13/2023 at 09:30 AM in Danville before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. Parties must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs. (Notice emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) Status Conference set for 4/28/2023 at 11:00 AM via Zoom Video Conference before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. (#Click on this link for guidance for participation via Zoom and #Click on this link for instructions on how to listen to public hearings) (Notice emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (Notice emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham) |
| Filing 9 Roseboro Notice to Michael Raposo re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM & #8 Brief / Memorandum in Support. (Notice emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham) |
| Filing 8 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Fred Clark. (Schnetzler, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Fred Clark. (Schnetzler, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Henry Schnetzler on behalf of Fred Clark (Schnetzler, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Fred Clark served on 9/30/2022, answer due 10/21/2022. (Return was emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Fred Clark. (Attachment: #1 USM-285 Form) (Originals mailed to USMS for service)(ham) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 9/19/2022. (Order emailed to Pro Se Plaintiff)(ham)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Fred Clark filed by Michael Raposo. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ham) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Raposo. (ham) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Raposo v. Clark | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Raposo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fred Clark | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Henry Schnetzler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
