City of Danville, Virginia et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
City of Danville, Virginia, Scott County Board of Supervisors and Wise County Board of Supervisors |
McKinsey and Company, Inc. |
4:2022cv00118 |
October 4, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Michael F Urbanski |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 2 Notice of MDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-32) from USDC/Northern District of California as to MDL No. 2996. (ham) |
Terry G. Kilgore, in accordance with Section B.9. of the Administrative Procedures for Filing, Signing and Verifying Pleadings and Papers by Electronic Means, a registered user is responsible for ensuring their mailing address, primary email address, and telephone number are kept up-to-date with this court by #updating the information in their PACER account. To update your information, log into PACER.gov and click the Maintenance tab to Update this information with this court. (ham) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McKinsey and Company, Inc. (Filing & Administrative fee $402.00; pay.gov receipt number AVAWDC-4044738) filed by City of Danville, Virginia; Wise County Board of Supervisors and Scott County Board of Supervisors. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ham) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.