Rockingham Precast, Inc. v. American Infrastructure - Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rockingham Precast, Inc.
Defendant: American Infrastructure - Maryland, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2011cv00024
Filed: March 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Office: Harrisonburg Office
Presiding Judge: Samuel G. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/14/11. (mka)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rockingham Precast, Inc. v. American Infrastructure - Maryland, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rockingham Precast, Inc.
Represented By: Larry Wayne Caudle, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Infrastructure - Maryland, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen Joseph Annino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?