Khader v. Randolph-Macon Academy
| Jumanah Khader |
| Randolph-Macon Academy |
| 5:2018cv00108 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Harrisonburg Office |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon: Telephonic Status Conference held on 10/5/2018. (ssm) |
| Filing 11 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Randolph-Macon Academy (Black, Josiah) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: (N) (No Interpreter requested) Status Conference set for October 5, 2018 at 10:00 AM by telephone conference call before District Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon. (Chambers will send the dial-in instructions to the parties.)(mf) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Settlement Hearing and Approval by Jumanah Khader. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Coffield, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Lawrence Coffield on behalf of Jumanah Khader (Coffield, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Filing Requirement to Randolph-Macon Academy - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (jv) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (jv) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of service of Randolph Macon Academy on August 29, 2018 upon Joseph F. Silek(Miles, Monique) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Josiah Milton Black on behalf of Randolph-Macon Academy (Black, Josiah) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Randolph-Macon Academy NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(jv) |
| Filing 2 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jumanah Khader (jv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Randolph-Macon Academy (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt number 0423-2958187.), filed by Jumanah Khader. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Khader v. Randolph-Macon Academy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jumanah Khader | |
| Represented By: | Monique Antonia Miles |
| Represented By: | Timothy Lawrence Coffield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Randolph-Macon Academy | |
| Represented By: | Josiah Milton Black |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
