Harris v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.
| Nicole Lynn Harris |
| First Advantage Background Services Corp. |
| 5:2019cv00047 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint #1 by First Advantage Background Services Corp..(McDonald, Esther) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. First Advantage Background Services Corp. answer due 8/12/2019.. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/12/2019. (jv)
|
| Filing 9 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (jv) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by First Advantage Background Services Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDonald, Esther) |
| Filing 7 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by First Advantage Background Services Corp. identifying Corporate Parent STG-Fairway U.S., LLC for First Advantage Background Services Corp.. (McDonald, Esther) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Esther Slater McDonald on behalf of First Advantage Background Services Corp. (McDonald, Esther) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Geoffrey H. Baskerville for Nicole Lynn Harris added. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/1/2019. (jv) Modified on 7/1/2019 to reflect correct Attorney association(jv).
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on First Advantage Background Services Corp. on 6/21/2019, answer due 7/12/2019.(jv) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Geoffrey H. Baskerville to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0423-3168586. by Nicole Lynn Harris. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Gayle, John) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to First Advantage Background Services Corp. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(jv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against First Advantage Background Services Corp. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt number 0423-3165687.), filed by Nicole Lynn Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. First Advantage Background Services Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Advantage Background Services Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Esther Slater McDonald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicole Lynn Harris | |
| Represented By: | John Cole Gayle, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey H. Baskerville |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
