Mendes v. Beahm et al
Nelson Mendes |
Taryn Logan, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County, Warren County Planning Department, David Beahm, Matthew Wendling, Warren County Building Inspections Department and Joseph Petty |
5:2019cv00072 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Motion Hearing set for January 2, 2020 at 2:00 PM in Harrisonburg before Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon. (mf) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling. (Bardot, Heather) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Nelson Mendes. (Johnson, Timothy) |
Filing 8 ORAL ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply( Responses due by 11/8/2019, Replies due by 11/8/2019.); granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document. Entered by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on November 14, 2019. (mf) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, , MOTION for Extension of Time to File by David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bardot, Heather) |
Filing 6 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling. (Bardot, Heather) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling. (Bardot, Heather) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (jv) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Kathleen Bardot on behalf of David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling (Bardot, Heather) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(jv) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Beahm, Taryn Logan, Joseph Petty, Warren County, Warren County Board of Zoning Appeals, Warren County Building Inspections Department, Warren County Planning Department, Matthew Wendling (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt #0423-3241722.), filed by Nelson Mendes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.