Burnett v. Life Insurance Company of North America
| Steven R. Burnett |
| Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America |
| 5:2020cv00074 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ERISA SCHEDULING ORDER. All nondispositive pretrial motions and issues are hereby referred to the Honorable Judge Joel C. Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 12/11/2020. (ck)
|
| Filing 12 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Life Insurance Company of North America (Constine, David) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Filing Requirement to Life Insurance Company of North America - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (jv) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint, by Life Insurance Company of North America.(Constine, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Substitute Party. Life Insurance Company of North America added. Sentara Healthcare and Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 11/20/2020. (jv)
|
| Filing 8 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan (Constine, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Substitute Party -Unopposed by Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Constine, David) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (jv) |
|
Filing 5
ORAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan and Sentara Healthcares unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading (ECF No. #4 ) is GRANTED. Defendants have until Monday, December 7, 2020 to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 11/17/2020. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(ck)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleadings-Unopposed by Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Constine, David) |
| Filing 3 Certified Mail Return Receipt by Steven R. Burnett. All Defendants.(Inigo, Alvaro) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(jv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY BENEFITS UNDER ERISA against Sentara Healthcare, Sentara Healthcare Short-Term Disability Plan (Filing & Administrative fee $ 400, receipt number AVAWDC-3522304.), filed by Steven R. Burnett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
