Fink v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
| Patricia Fink |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv00095 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Agreed Written Plan by Plaintiff Patricia Fink (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Montgomery, Wayne) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER:( Status Conference set for 5/21/2021 09:30 AM before Judge Thomas T. Cullen., Jury Trial set for 9/20/2021 - 9/21/2021 09:30 AM in Harrisonburg before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs.), CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe.. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/14/2021. (jv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Jury Trial set for 9/20/2021-9/21/2021 at 09:30 AM in Harrisonburg before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/21/2021 09:30 AM before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. Dial in instructions to be emailed to parties.(ck) |
| Jason Caldwell Greaves, in accordance with Section B.9. of the Administrative Procedures for Filing, Signing and Verifying Pleadings and Papers by Electronic Means, a registered user is responsible for ensuring their mailing address, primary email address, and telephone number are kept up-to-date with this court by updating the information in their PACER account. To update your information, log into PACER.gov and click the Maintenance tab to Update this information with this court. (jv) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) - located at Docket Entry #6 State Court Record Attachment #2 by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc.. (jv) |
| Filing 6 Paper State Court Records received from Rockingham County Circuit Court, CL20-3686, consisting of 1 Manila Envelope, (Paper records available for viewing in the Clerk's Office.) (Attachments: #1 1. State Court complaint, ccs, #2 Answer as filed in state court, #3 Service paperwork)(jv) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc.. Amendment to #1 Notice of Removal, Correction to Exhibit 3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 3A)(Greaves, Jason) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/4/2020) (jv). Modified on 12/4/2020 Replaced deficient pdf document with flattened pdf document(jv). |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (jv) |
|
Filing 3
Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Rockingham County Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 12/4/2020. (Order mailed to Rockingham County Circuit Court via US Mail)(jv)
|
| Filing 2 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. (jv) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Rockingham Circuit Court, case number CL20-3686. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402, receipt number BVAWDC-3563804), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. State Court complaint, #2 Exhibit 2. State Court Answer, #3 Exhibit 3. State Court filing of notice of removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
