Crandell v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce et al
Plaintiff: John Osborne Crandell, III
Defendant: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Christopher Anderson, Andrew Fiddes and Andrew R. Fiddes
Case Number: 5:2021cv00050
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth K Dillon
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by John Osborne Crandell, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kld)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRO SE MOTION for leave to file electronically by John Osborne Crandell, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jv)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Osborne Crandell, III as to U.S. Dept. of Commerce. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jv)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Substitute Party by United States. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification of Scope of Employment)(Frith, Krista)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS & Affidavit of Service Returned Executed on 7/26/2021 as to Christopher Anderson and Andrew R. Fiddes by John Osborne Crandell, III.(jv)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Christopher Anderson, Andrew Fiddes, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.(jv)
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons for Christopher Anderson, Andrew Fiddes, U.S. Dept. of Commerce by John Osborne Crandell, III (jv)
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Christopher Anderson, Andrew Fiddes, U.S. Dept. of Commerce (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402, receipt# 500003303.), filed by John Osborne Crandell, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Attachment A, #4 Envelope)(jv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crandell v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Osborne Crandell, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Dept. of Commerce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Fiddes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew R. Fiddes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?