MMG Insurance Company v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Plaintiff: MMG Insurance Company
Defendant: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2021cv00075
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Thomas T Cullen
Referring Judge: Joel C Hoppe
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER:( Status Conference set for 10/14/2022 02:00 PM before Judge Thomas T. Cullen., Jury Trial set for 2/13/2023 - 2/14/2023 09:30 AM in Harrisonburg before Judge Thomas T. Cullen. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs.), CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/20/2022. (jv)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN of service of Summons & Complaint for Declaratory Judgment on December 7, 2021 upon Progressive Northern Insurance Company(Conn, Lacey)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (aab)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progressive Northern Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Drive Insurance Holding, Inc. for Progressive Northern Insurance Company. (Bishop, Emily) (Main Document 5 replaced on 12/22/2021) (aab). Modified on 12/22/2021 (aab).Replaced deficient pdf document filed by Attorney with flattened pdf document
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Progressive Northern Insurance Company.(Bishop, Emily)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily P. Bishop on behalf of All Defendants (Bishop, Emily)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Progressive Northern Insurance Company NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(jv)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402, receipt number AVAWDC-3839522.), filed by MMG Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Personal Auto Declarations, #2 Exhibit B. Commercial Auto Insurance Coverage Summary)(jv) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2021: #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv). Modified on 11/29/2021 to add ccs(jv).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MMG Insurance Company v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MMG Insurance Company
Represented By: Lacey Conn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Represented By: Emily P. Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?