Suiter v. Taylor et al
| Antwhon Suiter |
| Deputy C.J. Taylor, Augusta County Sheriff's Department, Commonwealth of Virginia and Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police |
| 5:2023cv00062 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Augusta County Sheriff's Department, Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police, C.J. Taylor. (Attachments: #1 USM-285s)(jv) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If needed, forms may also be found at #www.vawd.uscourts.gov/forms.aspx. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/30/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(jv)
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Augusta County Sheriff's Department, Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police, C.J. Taylor by Antwhon Suiter (Attachments: #1 Proposed USM-285s)(jv) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Augusta County Sheriff's Department, Commonwealth of Virginia, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of State Police, C.J. Taylor, filed by Antwhon Suiter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jv) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antwhon Suiter. (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
