Noonan v. Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ashley Nicole Noonan and Ashley Culpepper
Defendant: Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2020cv00068
Filed: October 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Norman K Moon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Granger Klockenbrink on behalf of Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc. (Klockenbrink, Paul)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (White, Johneal)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) (No Interpreter requested) Jury Trial set for October 20 - 22, 2021 at 9:30 AM in Lynchburg before Senior Judge Norman K. Moon. Counsel must contact the Clerk's Office no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled trial date for your technology needs. (ca)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRETRIAL ORDER (CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou as set forth herein). Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on November 9, 2020. (ca)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc. (Huff, Catherine)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint by Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc..(Huff, Catherine)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN of service of Consolidate Shoe Company Inc. on 10/14/2020 upon Annette Roberts with POA to accept service for William Carrington(White, Johneal)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(ca)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR MONETARY AND EQUITABLE RELIEF against Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc. (Filing & Administrative fee $400.00, Receipt No. 0423-3509035), filed by Ashley Nicole Noonan. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noonan v. Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Nicole Noonan
Represented By: Johneal Moore White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Culpepper
Represented By: Johneal Moore White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc.
Represented By: Catherine Jackson Huff
Represented By: Paul Granger Klockenbrink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?