Trinity Tank Car, Inc. et al v. Davis-Frost, Inc.
Trinity Tank Car, Inc., TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc. and Trinity Industries Leasing Company |
Davis-Frost, Inc. |
6:2022cv00022 |
April 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Norman K Moon |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PRETRIAL ORDER (CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou as set forth herein). Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on June 15, 2022. (ca) |
Filing 12 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Davis-Frost, Inc. (Thompson, Paris) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint #1 Complaint,, by Davis-Frost, Inc..(Thompson, Paris) |
Filing 10 ORAL ORDER: Defendant Davis-Frost, Inc.'s motion for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings, Dkt. 9, is GRANTED. The deadline is hereby extended through June 15, 2022. Entered by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 6/1/2022. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(al) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Davis-Frost, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Thompson, Paris) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Calvin C. Henning, Registered Agent on May 11, 2022, filed by Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity Tank Car, Inc., TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc..(Davoli, Ashley) |
Filing 7 Electronic Summons Issued as to Davis-Frost, Inc. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(ca) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons for Davis-Frost, Inc. by Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity Tank Car, Inc., TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc. (Davoli, Ashley) |
Filing 5 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Trinity Industries, Inc. for TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc.. (Davoli, Ashley) |
Filing 4 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trinity Tank Car, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Trinity Industries, Inc. for Trinity Tank Car, Inc.. (Davoli, Ashley) |
Filing 3 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trinity Industries Leasing Company identifying Corporate Parent Trinity Industries, Inc. for Trinity Industries Leasing Company. (Davoli, Ashley) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Requirement - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (al) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Davis-Frost, Inc. (Filing & Administrative fee $402 receipt number AVAWDC-3938708), filed by TrinityRail Maintenance Services, Inc., Trinity Tank Car, Inc., and Trinity Industries Leasing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Invoice, #2 Exhibit B - RailGard 9000 Warranty for Trinity Rail, #3 Exhibit C - Trinity Railgard 9000 Field Inspection Protocol, #4 Exhibit D - Email-Davis-Frost RailGuard 9000 Damage Claim, #5 Exhibit E - Email-Kitworks-Folder;Davis Frost-Property Damaged Claim, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(al) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.